Case Libraries

2e1e41_ff04ac9674ba4be1848f097fee5bd061Here are some popular case repositories:

A New Flight Plan for Japan Airlines

Here is a mini-case ripped from the headlines. As the article states, “As much as JAL has focused on slashing costs, it has also sought to close the service gap with local rival All Nippon Airways – putting in new seats, revamping in-flight menus and installing electronic toilet seats in some business and first class cabins. That investment underscores JAL’s belief that customers will pay a premium for full-service flights.” You can also find a companion video from CNN here. This is great for an introductory class. Allows discussing all parts of a strategic audit including strategy, performance, resources, and competitive position. Also the right size to introduce case discussion for a group that has never done case analysis and discussion before. So how did Kazuo Inamori help change the culture at JAL: ‘nommunication’. “That is when he unleashed another secret weapon. I brought six cans of beer after these sessions or to people who were working late,” he says. After a beer or two, people opened up and told me their honest opinions.” (see the follow up story and video here)

 

Contributed by Aya Chacar

The CEO who wouldn’t leave

I found that a recent article in BusinessWeek can be used as an interesting reading to explore power & politics in the context of M&A. The article describes how William Johnson was designated as CEO of Duke Energy after its acquisition of Progress Energy and how he was fired after only two hours. The original M&A agreement included a condition that stated that the CEO of the target (Progress Energy) would be named CEO of the merged company. However, he was fired two hours after the designation and the CEO of the acquirer (Duke Energy) was named CEO of the merged company. I think this article could motivate to further study this acquisition. It seems to be a novel illustration of a hostile acquisition.

 

Contributed by Francisco Morales

Corporate Culture Artifact Hunt

We often talk about culture as a source of sustained competitive advantage (see Jay Barney’s article on the topic).Cave Painting I have run a great exercise where I send students on an artifact hunt through the business school to identify strengths and weaknesses in the school culture. Students present and analyze their artifacts and we discuss the implications for the competitiveness of the school. The next class explores the levers or impact points one would use to influence the culture. A final class might explore the implications of this for managing strategic change. The time this takes may make it better for a strategy elective but I am using it in my core class this semester.

Here is a bit more detail on how the exercise is run:

Continue reading

iPhone 5 as an Incremental Innovation

There is much hoopla about the release of each new iPhone but the innovations are, as one would predict, more incremental with each new release. The WSJ recently suggested that this is a good time to sell Apple stock because these incremental changes will allow rivals to catch up. Jimmy Kimmel offers a funny take on it when people perceive greater value added than there really is (he shows them an old iPhone, tells them its the new model, and they coo about how much better it is)…

Contributed by Russ Coff

Amazon Builds New Capabilities

A New York Times story reports that Amazon has long enjoyed an advantage over most brick and mortar rivals that its customers need not pay sales tax. That is now ending in some states as they agree to collect the taxes (notably California). So how are they responding? They are building more warehouses so that, in some metropolitan areas, they will eventually have same-day delivery. Ironically, with each day, they have become more of a brick and mortar operation. Still, that will give them an advantage over ecommerce rivals. It also requires substantial investments in distribution that rivals will have a hard time duplicating.

 

Contributed by Aya Chacar

Imitation: Pretty Profitable Parrots

The Economist just posted an interesting article on the value of imitation as a strategy. We often spend time focused on what makes a strategy inimitable. Of course, the spate of recent law suits tells the other side of the story in terms of the risks of copying. That said, there is little new under the stars and imitation can yield tremendous returns. We don’t see much focus in cases (or the literature) on imitation as a capability. What makes firms good at it?

 

Contributed by Sheen Levine